Here we go again - about a week and a half late, because I was finishing not one but two exchange stories - with an AO3 meme that's in at least half a dozen journals on my reading page. (You know, one of these days I'm going to try to think up one of these with different and more oddball questions....)

I note ahead of time that I have supplied links for some, but by no means all, of the specific works mentioned. This is partly because "all" would involve quite a lot of links, and partly a function of specific context; sometimes, just mentioning the story is enough, and sometimes, it feels appropriate to allow for immediate follow-up action.

[Technical note: After arm-wrestling HTML for an hour, I now think I know exactly how the DW rich text editor is broken where cuts are concerned. Certain kinds of formatting - notably involving indented paragraphs, but there may be other triggers - appear to cause the code parser to replace a "/div" with a "/cut" when one switches the editing mode between HTML and Rich Text (and sometimes when one simply edits the entry), which both causes the cut to break and mangles the syntax for subsequent instances of "div" statements. **Why** the code should do this is beyond me, but it's annoyingly persistent about it.]

20 Questions, no waiting.... )
[Edited; the toy's blog-code isn't working, and I'm too lazy to redo the analyses to pull links.]

All right, this is interesting.

I tried the text two of my Yuletide stories, The Solitary Sorceress of Oz and Four Views of General Jinjur, on this Web-based writing-style analyzer, and got this back:

"You write like L. Frank Baum."


Now initially, I was impressed; Solitary Sorceress was written to sound as much like Baum as I could manage, and getting this result back for that story seemed remarkably perceptive.  But Four Views -- while it's still an Oz story -- is structured distinctly differently (for one thing, it's written in four different first-person POVs)...and so I was a little surprised to get the Baum result a second time.  What this suggests to me is that the analyzer is looking for vocabulary more than it is for style as such.  Let's try another piece....

Hmm.  The Tale of Marian's Wedding (a Robin Hood story, also originally a Yuletide entry, gets this:

"You write like William Shakespeare."


And my latest Yuletide contribution, River of Death, yields:

"You write like Dan Brown."

Uh-huh, definitely a vocabulary analyzer.  Most of Shakespeare's surviving text is verse and play-script, not prose, so while the engine's period sense is more or less right, its grammar-and-voice parser is off.  And it correctly pegs River of Death as a thriller, so Dan Brown is a plausible guess (the sandbox is actually Clive Cussler's).  Most of the other fic I fed this also showed up as "Dan Brown"...except for my Yuletide Arabian Nights story, which the analyzer tagged as like Douglas Adams, for what reason I'm not sure.

Interesting toy, but not as nifty as I was hoping for.

In the wake of several pro authors' posts over the last couple of months in which said authors are mystified and/or badly confused by the fanfic itch, we've now got a post from a pro author who has brought immense amounts of common sense to the table.

Jim Hines displays much wisdom, in this matter and in many others.   And he writes good books, too.

Tags:
Page generated Jan. 1st, 2026 06:27 pm

Charter

This is a fanfic journal. I'm interested in a wide variety of fandoms as well as in meta- and theoretical discussions; see my interests list for specific fandom categories. Comments, critiques, recs, reviews, and the like are always welcome.

December 2025

S M T W T F S
  123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Subscription Filters

Most Popular Tags

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios